In what can only be deemed Orwellian in nature, the Arizona laws permit the state to petition the Court to send sex offenders to a mental hospital following the conclusion of their prison sentence.
BLOG
Prior Acts of Misconduct
If the defendant is charged with a violation of a sexual offense, the court may admit evidence that the defendant has committed past acts which would constitute a sexual offense and may consider the bearing this evidence has on any matter to which it is relevant.
Child Protection Services
If you become a suspect in an investigation involving child sexual abuse allegations, your first contact with the authorities may be from a social service agency like Child Protective Services. People are often told the CPS investigation is simply trying to get information to close a file or to help a traumatized child. Do not be fooled.
White Collar Crimes
These crimes usually involve violations of particular federal and state laws concerning commercial transactions and securities transactions. However, they often involve charges of money laundering and various kinds of fraud.
The Lawyer's Role in a Rape Case
In Arizona, rape is called sexual assault and is defined by A.R.S. 13-1406 as follows.
Start By Believing
How a Federal program designed to combat sexual abuse went bad.
Anatomy of a Criminal Case
A “crime” is an offense against the state—a violation of a written statute where there is a penalty attached.
The U.S. Supreme Court Buys Into A Myth
A long accepted belief that sex offenders have a high rate of recidivism turns out to be a myth.
Cross-Examining The Young Child In A Sexual Abuse Case: some General Thoughts
As any parent understands, the young child's world is one where reality and fantasy often merge. And yet this same parent, when called as juror in a case alleging child sexual abuse..
Defending Against Character Evidence: The Weapon Of Choice For Prosecutors
Until recently the rules of evidence precluded the use of character evidence to determine the incident. Character evidence is so central in shaping our opinions as to whether someone did or did not do something that the law long excluded it.